Hearing, audit raise serious questions about Texas’ regard for workers
Anyone considering moving to Texas to find work may want to reconsider.
A recent hearing conducted jointly by two committees of the Texas House raises serious questions about worker safety in the Lone Star State. Related questions may make one question the official regard of workers in general, given news about advice given to employers regarding unemployment benefits.
Texas employers not required to carry workers comp insurance
According to a July 29 article in The Texas Tribune, the nation’s second-largest state is dead last in requiring employers to carry workers’ compensation insurance. That is to say, it’s the only state that allows all employers except “public entities” to choose whether to provide workers comp coverage:
“Texas is the only state that does not require employers to purchase workers’ compensation insurance. As such, 33 percent of Texas employers [in 2008] elect[ed] not to purchase such insurance; the committee sought information about whether that number had changed in the wake of the Entergy decision. Cathy DeWitt, vice-president for government affairs at the Texas Association of Business, testified that her group would not support making workers’ comp mandatory.”
To be fair, a slide show linked to from the article, from the state department of insurance indicates that 70 per cent of employers who elect not to subscribe to workers comp do cover employers through private insurance. Further, the presentation shows that the one-third of employers without workers comp is a declining number; in 1993, the number was 44 per cent.
Still, that’s a bunch of uncovered workers. Of course, without buying workers comp coverage, the employer leaves itself open to lawsuits–and some indicate employers indicate that’s the main reason they do buy coverage.
On the other hand, as the hearing shows, there’s plenty of room in the entire system for improvement.
House hearing focuses on serious workplace injuries
The pair of committees–Business and Industry, and Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence–convened to examine “concerns over whether benefits in Texas were adequate in the case of serious workplace injuries,” concerns apparently fueled by reports coming from the BP tragedy in the Gulf.
“José Herrera, a worker badly burned by hot oil in an accident in a Citgo refinery in 2008, testified that his benefits (which will not last a lifetime) amounted to less than one-quarter of his former take-home pay and that his insurance has often delayed needed surgeries. ‘I’m in pain the day this happened to me, til now, for the rest of my life,’ Herrera told the committees.
“Some lawmakers voiced support for reviewing benefits allotted to badly injured workers. ‘I would hope somewhere along the line some subcommittee would look at the adequacy of benefits,” said state Rep. Jim Jackson, R-Carrollton.
Entergy ruling limits abilities to sue
“Herrera’s ability to sue for damages is severely constrained by a 2007 Texas Supreme Court decision. In Entergy Gulf States v. John Summers, the court ruled that plant owners can shield themselves from lawsuits by injured contract workers by purchasing workers’ compensation insurance, which pays workers a portion of their wages as well as medical bills in the event of injury. Contractors — the companies that actually employ the workers — are already able to shield themselves in this way; what was new was the extension of this right to companies that own the workplace.”
Another Tribune piece, also dated June 29, says, “The Entergy ruling startled many Texas officials and stirred anger among some lawmakers, who argued the legislative intent was ignored. But so far, efforts to change the law to get around the ruling have fallen short — the Texas Supreme Court reaffirmed its ruling last year — though another try is expected in the coming session.”
Audit finds more workers comp issues
Yet another July 29 piece, this in Texas Watchdog, reports more troubling details. After acknowledging long-standing features that traditionally have drawn workers to Texas (no state income tax, relatively available work, and a decent cost of living), the Watchdog notes that, “But if you hit some hard times, the place isn’t so hospitable, a recently released audit shows. In fact, one could say the state is in no hurry to police employers who might abuse the rights of employees injured or otherwise compromised.”
Citing a report from the state auditor’s office, the Watchdog says “pending workers’ comp enforcement cases have been open for an average of 467 days. That’s about a year and three months.
“Fifty-eight of those cases have been open since 2007, and one lingers from 2006, when oversight for worker’s comp moved from the dismantled Texas Worker’s Compensation Commission to the insurance department. The division of workers’ comp issues disciplinary orders when providers and carriers have not complied with the law.”
Among other findings:
- “The case log that Division management used to monitor workers’ compensation enforcement cases was not complete. Auditors identified 81 . . . cases that were not on . . . the log and 61 pending . . . cases that the Division had assigned to [Division employees] whose employment had been terminated the prior calendar year.”
- “The Division did not consistently conduct supervisory reviews of staff’s work . . . . According to the Division, from March 2009 to March 2010, the Division conducted only two supervisory reviews of cases that were progressing to disposition.”
- The audit also found a reporting problem caused by physical layout: “This reporting structure makes it difficult for the Associate Commissioner . . . to monitor . . . enforcement cases.”
- Perhaps most disturbing, this finding regarding reduced penalties: “In addition, for two cases with the largest penalties assessed, the team leader . . . approved settlement amounts significantly less the amount recommended by the staff attorneys assigned to the cases. However, there was no documentation justifying the reduced penalty amounts. According to Division procedures, settlement amounts and their correspondence should be documented.”
Skirting unemployment benefits
Now, what about those unemployment benefits? The Watchdog also cites the case of a high-ranking Texas Workforce Commission employee who has been giving some dubious advice during employer workshops. It comes from a July 7 story in the Houston Chronicle:
“Say you’re the boss and you’re going to fire one of your employees. Instead of booting the employee out the door, the Texas Workforce Commission recommends giving your employee the option to resign.
“Employees given that choice are more likely to conclude they aren’t eligible for benefits, said Jonathan Babiak, who spoke before 800 Houston area employers recently at a seminar sponsored by the Texas Workforce Commission.
“It’s not the employer’s obligation to correct that misunderstanding, said Babiak, [then-]deputy director of appellate services for the Texas Workforce Commission in Austin. If employees resign, he said, ‘chances are they won’t file a claim.’ “
The Chronicle also quotes an attorneys, speaking from appropriate disgust:
” ‘This is outrageous,’ Houston employment lawyer Margaret Harris said. ‘If you resign in lieu of termination, of course you’re entitled” to benefits.
” ‘This is an agent of the state of Texas telling employers how to defraud citizens of the state of Texas of a benefit to which they are lawfully entitled and that they very much need,’ said Harris, of Butler & Harris.”
The Watchdog was unable to get a statement from Babiak, but did manage to reach an attorney across the hall from him.
“Across the hall from Babiak at the Texas Workforce Commission sits the office of Ronald Congleton, the commissioner representing labor in Texas.
” ‘We certainly were not happy with those comments,’ said Bob Stewart, an attorney in Congleton’s office. ‘Counseling employers how to avoid paying unemployment? We aren’t in favor of that.’ “
The Watchdog also learned that Babiak is no longer a deputy director of appellate services.
Nope, he’s been transferred, apparently…
…to the human resources department.
***********************************************************************************************************************
Have you, a friend or a loved one been injured on the job? Whether you’re merely seeking answers about your rights or believe a lawsuit may be necessary, be sure to seek counsel with attorneys trained and experienced in workers’ compensation. Here’s some resources:
