‘Delicate’ compromise may avoid killing Illinois system
Oklahoma governor outmaneuvers Senate; North Carolina measure advances
We most recently updated our coverage of the Illinois’ workers’ comp hullabaloo in this post.
‘Blow up bill” still in play despite progress toward compromise
Since then, there’s been progress, of sorts; from a May 26 piece at PressMentor.com:
After months of negotiations, breakdowns and false starts, state business groups and legislators have a tentative agreement to reform Illinois’ workers’ compensation system, though the lead House negotiator says there is still work to be done.
“We have two options: We have this compromise agreement that is moving closer to having something that we can move forward with, and we have the blow-up bill,” Rep. John Bradley, D-Marion, said Thursday.
“Those are both viable options, and we intend to pass one of those two before the end of session,” he said. (The “blow-up bill” is Bradley’s alternative proposal to abolish the entire workers’ comp system in Illinois, leaving decisions on individual workplace injuries up to the courts.)
Supporters say measure could save $500 million
A May 27 account in the Chicago Tribune adds, “Illinois businesses would save about $500 million but give up on their biggest demand under a worker’s compensation overhaul that key lawmakers called a tentative deal Thursday.
“The plan includes a 30 percent reduction in the rates businesses pay to physicians, uses nationally recognized standards for determining an injury’s severity and creates a medical network for handling workplace injuries.
Idea dropped to “prove” injuries are work-related
“It would not require employees to prove injuries are directly related to their jobs, a demand businesses had made through months of negotiations.”
Legislators describe the status as a “delicate balance” and emphasize that nothing is final, yet. However, it seems as though Bradley’s House Speaker Michael Madigan’s support of the so-called “nuclear option” has spurred serious compromise, which is much needed in the state with the costliest workers’ comp premiums in the nation.
Governor’s vetoes delayed until too late for Legislature to reconvene
In Oklahoma, according to a May 27 Tulsa World report, the governor has pulled an end-around concerning a contentious workers’ comp bill:
Gov. Mary Fallin vetoed five bills Thursday, thwarting a possible override on a contentious workers compensation “trailer bill” by withholding action until it was too late for the Legislature to reconvene before Friday’s constitutional deadline to adjourn.
Fallin signed 38 bills.
The workers comp measure, Senate Bill 761, would have changed the payment schedule agreed to in an earlier bill in a way that would have generally favored physicians who provide medical equipment such as crutches and wheelchairs and implants such as artificial joints.
Legislators didn’t make it easy for governor
As reported May 28 in The Oklahoman:
Thursday was the last day for Fallin to act on bills passed this session. Legislators ended their business last week, but didn’t adjourn. The session will end officially at 5 p.m. Friday.
Legislators finishing their business last week made it more difficult for the governor to silently veto legislation.
Because the session isn’t adjourned officially until Friday, Fallin accomplished the rare feat of getting her work done before lawmakers. She had no choice.
When legislators are in session, Fallin has five days to sign a bill. If she doesn’t sign it, the measure becomes law. She has 15 days to sign a bill when lawmakers are out of session. If she doesn’t sign it, the bill does not become a law; that action is often called a pocket veto.
North Carolina proposal clears House
We have updates on the proposed changes in North Carolina, too. From a May 27 piece at Forbes.com, “An agreement on changes to rules governing North Carolina workers’ compensation claims cleared a House committee on Thursday.
“The panel voted to recommend a bill its chief sponsor said followed weeks of negotiations with groups representing employers, employees and the state. Rep. Dale Folwell of Winston-Salem says the agreement will protect workers, compensate the injured and encourage people to return to work.
Total disability payments capped
“The bill caps temporary payments for a totally disabled worker at nearly 10 years. The current law has no cap, which Folwell said places North Carolina at a competitive disadvantage. The bill also raises the maximum time for wage benefits for the partially disabled and for death benefits.”
‘Advocates’ say important rights preserved
ProtectingInjuredWorkers.com has some background info:
Attorney Gina Cammarano, who is a North Carolina State Bar Board Certified Workers’ Compensation Specialist, as well as a former Special Deputy Commissioner at the North Carolina Industrial Commission, said, “The NC Chamber fought hard and won major concessions, and yet the common ground preserved in the consensus bill allows North Carolinians to retain a fair workers’ compensation system.” Cammarano and Hank Patterson, representing the AFL-CIO, spearheaded extensive negotiations on behalf of the North Carolina Advocates for Justice and its members who represent injured workers from across North Carolina. Throughout negotiations, NCAJ supported changes to the existing law that:
- Incentivize people to return to suitable employment;
- Protect the most seriously injured workers at a cost reasonable for business; and
- Retain a fair approach toward injured workers and employers.
Dick Taylor, of NCAJ, said, “Many may feel that the bill does not go far enough to reduce costs and others will feel the provisions fall short of protecting the interests of injured workers, but in times such as these all sides made compromises, and overall we feel the changes preserve the backbone of our Workers’ compensation system that pays fair compensation to injured workers at a reasonable cost to the employers.”
We can help you find an attorney
Frequently enough, a worker’s compensation case may be so complex as to demand legal representation. However, sometimes what seems like a cut-and-dried situation to an injured worker may result in a smaller award than envisioned–or even a denial. Have you, a friend or a loved one been injured on the job? Whether you’re merely seeking answers about your rights or believe a lawsuit may be necessary, be sure to seek counsel with attorneys trained and experienced in workers’ compensation. Here’s some resources:

