Injured in Colorado Due to a Fall at Work

Accidents happen in the workplace. Have you been injured in Colorado due to a fall at work?

What type of injuries did you receive when you were injured in Colorado due to a fall at work? Are these injuries keeping you from working? Have you missed a lot of time at work? Are you disabled as a result of your injuries? Do you have high medical bills?

If you were injured in Colorado due to a fall at work, the answers to these questions will greatly affect your future. The answers to these questions will make a big difference to you and your family.

Workers’ compensation claim

Did you file a Colorado workers’ compensation claim? Is Colorado workers’ compensation assisting you?

In 1915, the Colorado General Assembly passed the Colorado Workers’ Compensation Act. This Act made it a mandate that Colorado employers would give wage replacement and pay for medical care for their workers who were injured on the job. Workers’ compensation would then be the exclusive remedy for an injured worker in exchange for this protection.

In Colorado, workers’ compensation comes under the heading of the Department of Labor and Employment. It is regulated by the Division of Workers Compensation within the Colorado Department of Labor and Employment.

Purpose of workers’ compensation

Workers’ compensation in Colorado is in place to assist workers who have been injured on the job. In fact, the intent of the Colorado general assembly in regard to the Workers’ Compensation Act of Colorado is stated as being “to assure the quick and efficient delivery of disability and medical benefits to injured workers at a reasonable cost to employers.

In Colorado, workers’ compensation is mandatory, with no exemption for employers with a small number of employees. However, there are some waivers that are allowed.

An employer in Colorado has four options when it comes to workers’ compensation insurance. A Colorado employer may insure through the competitive state fund, use a private carrier, insure through groups of employers or be self-insured.

Benefits

If you were injured in Colorado due to a fall at work, you may have several workers’ compensation benefits that you are entitled to. These include:

Medical treatment of your injuries without monetary or time limits
Reimbursement of mileage to and from physicians’ appointments that includes lost wages and mileage costs
Death and burial cost given to your family in the event of your death because of injuries sustained on the job
Replacement income benefits.

In many cases, it is replacement income benefits that form the major part of Colorado workers’ compensation claims. This may be true for you if you were injured in Colorado due to a fall at work.

Replacement income benefits in Colorado are available in four different ways. These are:

Temporary partial disability benefits (TPD)
Temporary total disability benefits (TTD)
Permanent partial disability benefits (PPD)
Permanent total disability benefits (PTD).

Has your Colorado employer refused to file a workers’ compensation claim for you? Are you not sure what you should do? Do you have questions concerning workers’ compensation benefits that you may be entitled to in Colorado?

A workers’ compensation attorney will work for you. They will answer your questions and work hard to see that you get all of the workers’ compensation benefits that are rightfully yours in Colorado.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Filed under: Work Injuries,Workers Compensation — Tags: , , — james @ 2:56 pm

Need Help with your Workers Comp Claim?

Fill out the short form below and a local Workers Comp attorney will review your case for FREE!
Don't wait -- Get help winning your workers comp case today!




Pinnacol ‘quits’; scammers get busted; young man gets stuck in wheelchair

More news from around the country, showing the stressors at work in workers’ comp programs

m

We’ve been following  the situation in Colorado with Pinnacol since 2009. Pinnacol Assurance has wanted to break free of quasi-government agency and be owned privately by policy holders.

Pinnacol bails out–Colorado state employees left up in air

According to an Aug. 5 piece in The Washington Post, “A Colorado-chartered workers’ compensation insurer will no longer administer the claims of state employees following disagreements with state officials over lavish trips, compensation and golden parachutes for key executives.

“Pinnacol Assurance’s decision to bail forced Colorado to scramble to hire an independent contractor to administer claims for state workers. State Rep. Sal Pace, D-Pueblo, said about 42,000 employees were affected, including about 1,000 who have claims pending.”

‘Do the damned work”

It’s not clear how a state-chartered entity can refuse to do its work, and doing so has drawn the ire of a leader in State House, according to a piece in the Pueblo Chieftain. Apparently, Pinnacol had announced its intention in January:

“It sounds like they just don’t want to do the work,” said House Minority Leader Sal Pace, D-Pueblo. “I’m sorry to tell Pinnacol this, but you’re owned by the state of Colorado. Do the damned work.”

One year remained on Pinnacol’s contract as third-party administrator of state employees’ workers’ compensation claims when it terminated its services to the state and forced Colorado to put the services out to bid.

“They didn’t say why, but they did send a letter,” said Markie Davis, state risk manager.

Davis acknowledged that Pinnacol informed the state in January of its intent to discontinue offering administrative services to the state, which is self-insured as it had been before Pinnacol bowed out.

According to the Denver Post, the idea of changing Pinnacol to a private company is still on the table. We’ll keep monitoring developments.

Alaskan tour operator busted

Another early August article, from Canadian Business, describes a sorry situation involving an Alaskan tour operator that’s getting popped for more than a mil in penalties because they did not carry workers’ comp coverage for employees:

An Alaska tour operator has been fined $1.5 million for allegedly failing to carry workers’ compensation insurance, violating stop work orders and misclassifying employees as independent contractors.

Ultimate Tours LLC and Godwin Glacier Tours LLC can appeal the Alaska Workers’ Compensation Board decision or ask that it reconsider. An attorney for the tour operator declined comment Friday.

Mike Monagle, director of the workers’ compensation division, said the state attempted to reach agreement with the company but it wasn’t cooperative with investigators.

He said stop work orders were issued in 2005 and 2010, meaning the company couldn’t have employees. He said the operator designated workers as independent contractors.

What were they thinking?

It really makes you wonder, doesn’t it? What are employers thinking when they get warned and proceed, anyway, to try to:

1. not only leave workers at risk, but also

2. to defy the state, when obviously it's up-to-speed enough on the scam to issue a stop-work order?

Is it merely a case of "desperate times require desperate measures"? Or is it more likely the case that some employers simply think workers should accept whatever conditions they impose, shut up and keep working?

19 companies jammed up over employee-contractor designations

Whatever it is, it's not restricted to the hinterlands.  An Aug. 17 account by Bloomberg BusinessWeek reveals some details about 19 companies getting whacked over similar deceptive practices:

Connecticut labor officials said Wednesday that they have recently halted work by 19 companies at six construction sites in Westport.

The state said the firms misclassified workers as independent contractors to avoid workers compensation and other payments.

Gary Pechie, director of the Department of Labor's division of wage and workplace standards, said the companies face a daily fine of $300 for each day they fails to carry workers' compensation coverage as required by law.

How many workers does shutdown affect?

Think of the workers who can't ply their trade after having six worksites shut down. The way I grew up, and partly because of the section of town I was raised in, my friends and I would simply walk off a construction job when we were treated shabbily. Our motto was: "I was looking for a job when I found this one."

In this economy, I doubt those workers at any of the six sites share our youthful bravado.

Robbery at second-job leaves young man in chronic pain

Our last vignette for this edition concerns a young man who was so exuberant about work that he got himself two jobs. At the part-time, he got shot during a robbery, and hasn't been able to work at any job since.

Worse, because of the state's workers' comp laws, he's prevented from accessing higher-grade health care that his employer's health insurance might provide. From an Aug. 7 post at tampabay.com:

At 26, Sam McGinnis was an energetic workaholic with a day job at Time Customer Service in Tampa and a part-time gig at a CVS in Carrollwood. A lanky 6-foot-3, he enjoyed riding motorcycles and working on cars.

On Nov. 29, 2008, long before dawn, a gunman in a clown mask walked into the drugstore, shot McGinnis twice, and ran out with $80.

The second bullet entered McGinnis' chest and traveled through his liver, stomach, bowels, colon and lumbar nerve.

McGinnis, now 29, has not worked since. By day, the pain in his legs keeps him in a wheelchair; by night, it keeps him awake.

His doctors have told him they can do no more for him than prescribe medications for his pain. McGinnis doesn't want to accept that.

But he may not have a choice.

Since he was hurt at work, McGinnis' medical needs are covered by workers' compensation insurance, not the health insurance he had through his day job. And that, he and his family contend, could be standing in the way of his recovery.

What got 'reformed,' exactly?

The changes in the law that leave McGinnis in this damnable condition were supposedly a "reform" of poorly crafted Florida workers' comp laws. Read the whole story, and see what you think. Myself? It makes me want to start asking questions anytime I hear the phrase workers' comp reform.

It also makes me want to have the business card of a trained, experienced workers' comp attorney.

We can help you find an attorney

Frequently enough, a worker's compensation case may be so complex as to demand legal representation. However, sometimes what seems like a cut-and-dried situation to an injured worker may result in a smaller award than envisioned--or even a denial. Have you, a friend or a loved one been injured on the job? Whether you’re merely seeking answers about your rights or believe a lawsuit may be necessary, be sure to seek counsel with attorneys trained and experienced in workers’ compensation. Here’s some resources:

Workers compensation basics

Injury on the job



Need Help with your Workers Comp Claim?

Fill out the short form below and a local Workers Comp attorney will review your case for FREE!
Don't wait -- Get help winning your workers comp case today!




States around the nation facing workers comp budget woes; Texas whistleblowers ‘blasted’ by chief

Update from preceding post: Sandra Herold died Monday night, according to the Boston Herald. Herald, 72, was the owner of the 200-pound chimp who mutilated Charla Nash. We first covered the story here because of the legal questions raised about workers’ compensation versus a civil settlement. Herold’s cause of death was reportedly a ruptured aortic aneurysm. Any effect on the $50 million civil suit filed by Nash’s attorney was unknown at post time, but we will continue to follow the case.

———————————————————————————————————————————————

We’ve discussed successes and shortcomings of various states’ workers comp programs, from furloughs that were ruled illegal in California, to subsequent California rulings contrasted against efforts to privatize in Oklahoma and Colorado– and even looked over the best and worst “report cards” for various states.

But according to at least one report, states may have more pending budget crunches in common than not.

Workers comp and state budgets

In a May 24 post, BusinessInsurance.com says, “State budget shortfalls are hindering the resolution of workers compensation cases and may increase employer claims costs as states cut back on judges and other critical staff, risk managers say.

“Furloughs of state workers including administrative law judges, auditors and other public employees that handle claims are increasing litigation expenses and even hamper return-to-work efforts, risk managers say.”

The article says an opposing point of view is that reduced personnel is OK because injuries/claims are going down, so less staff, at least temporarily, is not an impediment to processing and treating injured workers.

Still others counter that these same staff reductions are linked to rises in claims’ resolution problems.

“In an April report, the National Conference of State Legislatures said ‘state budget gaps loom as far as the eye can see.’ It said 31 states and Puerto Rico foresee fiscal 2012 budget gaps of at least $73.5 billion, and 21 states project fiscal 2013 budget gaps of at least $64.7 billion. ‘Including previous amounts, states will have addressed budget gaps in excess of $531 billion since the recession began in December 2007,’ according to the report.

“The issue is not apparent in all jurisdictions and depends on the state, risk managers say.”

Colorado lege thinks Pennacol is lowballing

For example, in Colorado, Pinnacol Assurance remains a hot topic for industry news, occasionally even wandering into the streetlights of mainstream news. Apparently, Pinnacol’s latest bid to take itself private–out from under its “status as a political subdivision of the state” to being a private vehicle owned by policy holders, in the form of a mutual insurance company.

“Gov. Bill Ritter Jr. had examined selling off Pinnacol as a solution in addressing Colorado’s estimated $1.3 billion shortfall for the fiscal year that begins in July,” says BI.

Pinnacol submitted a bid on itself, offering $200 million.

Nobody bit that hook, so Pinnacol recently upped the ante to $330 million–but still can’t get the lege to bite:

“Talks broke down after it became apparent that there was a lack of support for the proposal among state lawmakers, many of whom said the insurer’s worth was far greater than what Pinnacol was offering. No legislation aimed at privatizing the insurer was ever introduced.”

No legislation? At all? Not even one bill? In either house? Wow–usually some lobbyist can get at least one bill introduced.

I-1082 in Washington State

OK, let’s swing over to Washington state, where something called I-1082 is a lightning rod of sorts. (Google it. Can’t say how far down the links are relevant, but “I-1082″ returns more than 18 million results, in .33 seconds.)

A May 24 opinion piece at the Kitsap Peninsula (Washington state) Business Journal says that Washington employers of every stripe are sick of rising costs for workers comp premiums and are afraid there’s no end in sight.

“Our per worker costs are the second highest in the nation, according to the National Academy of Social Insurance. And while improvements in workplace safety have reduced injuries 55 percent since 1990, claims are taking longer, and costs skyrocket as workers are off the job until their claims are resolved.

“According to the Washington Department of Labor & Industries, injured workers who miss work are off an average 274 days, over twice the national average. Washington also leads the nation in the number of expensive, lifelong pensions awarded each year, a rate that has ballooned more than 300 percent since 1996.”

During times of plenty, writes Don Brunell , president of the Association of Washington Business, premiums were invested, thereby masking weaknesses in the system; but that’s been stripped away during the financial crisis.

Among other measures being considered, Brunell describes “Initiative 1082″ as “only the beginning” but also the only real hope for ending “the state’s monopoly on workers’ compensation insurance. Washington is one of only four states with a monopoly. With the exception of 375 large self-insured businesses, all employers are required to purchase their insurance from the government. The initiative would allow private insurers to compete with the state under the very same rules and restrictions governing L&I and self-insured companies like Boeing.”

We’ll end this post with a Texas twister on attempts to reform and streamline workers comp systems.

Workers comp whistleblowers canned in Texas

Earlier this month, the Texas Tribune ran a story called “The Workers’ Comp Whistleblowers,” Following is the nut graf, referring to former state fraud enforcement attorney Cathy Lockhart, who first was put on “emergency leave” then fired a few weeks later for ” ‘secret and clandestine’ activity — namely, that she researched how much money had been spent on medical fraud investigations”:

“Lockhart, along with three other former division employees who have come forward, say the division’s staff identified and recommended sanctions for nearly 70 Texas physicians who overbilled and overtreated patients, engaging in such practices as ordering needless surgeries or prescribing unnecessary narcotics. In the process, the former employees say, a relatively small number of rogue doctors cost insurers millions of dollars and, more importantly, placed patients in harm’s way. Yet since 2005, division records show, the state has sanctioned just five doctors with removal from the workers’ comp system — and only in cases involving paperwork violations rather than harm to patients. The other cases are said to be pending.”

Ok, you get the drift. Now let’s fast-forward a few days, to May 18, when the Tribune answers its own headline question “Workers’ Comp: What’s Next?” with this lede: “On the heels of allegations last week by former employees of the Texas Department of Insurance’s Division of Workers’ Compensation that their higher-ups have failed to sanction or remove dozens of doctors accused of overtreatment and overbilling, Texas lawmakers are pledging to investigate the consequences for patient care and the state’s finances. In addition, sources say the division’s lead enforcement attorney has resigned, bringing to six the number of employees who’ve exited the division’s medical oversight and enforcement staff since February.”

Deeper in the story, this nugget: “Three former employees of the division — Dr. Bill Nemeth, its first medical advisor, who served from 2001 to 2007; Dr. Ken Ford, the assistant medical advisor from 2004 to March of this year; and Dr. Clark Watts, a consultant on the division’s Medical Quality Review Panel (MQRP) — each say they resigned out of frustration that cases were not being enforced, and in some instances, the division leadership “traded political favors” (Nemeth’s words) in keeping cases from moving into enforcement.”

OK, so high-ranking officials quit in frustration and whistleblowers were fired. Still, “Texas lawmakers” are aware of the situation and “are pledging to investigate.” That should put a stop to any shenanigans, right?

Well, apparently not. On May 21, we get this lede from a Tribune blog, entitled “Workers’ Comp Chief Blasts Whistleblowers”: “As the Division of Workers’ Compensation heads into a public hearing at the Sunset Advisory Commission next week, Commissioner Rod Bordelon is blasting his former employees for their allegations in the Texas Tribune earlier this month, putting the blame on them for abuse and mismanagement in the system.”

The entire matter was headed for a showdown May 25 in a hearing of the Sunset Advisory Commission. More on that when it becomes available.

*******************************************************************************************************************

Are you covered by Workman’s Compensation?

Read here for an introduction.



Need Help with your Workers Comp Claim?

Fill out the short form below and a local Workers Comp attorney will review your case for FREE!
Don't wait -- Get help winning your workers comp case today!




Governor’s action overturned in California; other states workers’ comp funds under more scrutiny

Hard times are causing states to rethink approaches for funding various workers’ comp funds, and in California, a superior court judge “has ruled that Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger illegally furloughed 7,400 employees of the State Compensation Insurance Fund this year,” according to a post at the Insurance & Financial Advisor Web site.

“Superior Court Judge Charlotte Woolard affirmed a prior ruling against the state involving the employees for the “State Fund,” which sells workers’ compensation insurance to employers and uses the proceeds to operate, according to the San Francisco Chronicle. The State Fund relies on no funding from the state treasury.”

The IFA post said the ruling would provide “back pay plus interest for the days they missed work,” but a more recent Chronicle story reports the issue is undecided. Explaining that “[t]he ruling came in a case filed by the Service Employees International Union Local 1000, which represents 6,260 fund employees,” the article also says,  “It’s unclear whether employees will be able to collect back pay for the days they were furloughed. The state fund and the SEIU believe the order entitles them to it.

“But, said a spokesman for the governor’s office, ‘The judge did not rule on the issue of back pay. She was silent on the issue.’ ”

A legislative task in Oklahoma recently heard testimony from Nevada officials that changing from a state-operated to a privately operated system has improved rates for businesses in Nevade, according to a CNBC post dated Sept. 2.

“Nevada’s workers’ compensation insurance rates have dropped since that state privatized the agency providing such insurance, Nevada executives told an Oklahoma legislative task force Wednesday.

“The task force is considering privatizing Oklahoma’s workers’ compensation agency, CompSource Oklahoma.”

The change in Nevade came a decade ago, “when it transformed the agency from a monopoly to a mutual insurance agency owned by its policyholders, said Douglas Dirks, president and chief executive of Employers Holdings, Inc.

” ‘Rates have gone down fairly consistently since the market was opened,’ Dirks said.”

Reports from Colorado include descriptions of  a “parade of angry workers [who were] hurt on the job” and subsequently testified in a recent probe of the state-chartered, tax exempt, quasi-governmental agency Pinnacol by a special committee of legislators and citizens.

According to a “Politics West” spot in The Denver Post on Sept. 1, injured workers questioned not only a surplus of coverage denials but also surplus cash reserves, too much spying on claimants and an out-of-touch perks package for agency compensation packages.

“Mike Byrd, hurt in a work-related car accident in 2004, told a special panel created by the legislature about Pinnacol denying treatments and trying to send a company nurse with him to every one of his doctor’s appointments as a ‘spy.’

“Like others, Byrd questioned how Pinnacol, a quasi-governmental agency that was struggling to remain solvent a decade ago, could grow so profitable that it has amassed a $700 million surplus.”

Also on Sept. 1,  the Durango Herald reported: “A former Durango firefighter testified Monday that the state’s workers’ compensation company spied on him and trashed his reputation in the community in an attempt to deny his claim for an injured back.”

Stahl said he was injured twice and Pinnacol paid for the first claim but refused the second. “He finally sold his house to pay for surgery out of his own pocket. Surgery has helped, but he had to retire from the fire department. He became a nurse and now is studying case management for injured workers.”

Both accounts report a few injured workers testified that their cases were handled well by Pinnacol, but the Herald piece ends thusly:

“Stahl said it was inexcusable for the state’s dominant workers’ compensation insurer to spend $143,930 for a luxury suite at Invesco Field, home of the Denver Broncos; a $133,000 trip to the Four Seasons Resort in Scottsdale, Ariz.; and a $2,515 dinner, which included two plates of $144 lobster and three bottles of $115 wine, while workers suffer.

“Pinnacol has defended the expenses as good for morale.”

***************

Have you been injured on the job?

Here’s what to do first.



Need Help with your Workers Comp Claim?

Fill out the short form below and a local Workers Comp attorney will review your case for FREE!
Don't wait -- Get help winning your workers comp case today!










 LeadRival LP BBB Business Review


Online Marketing for Lawyers


Attorneys:   Join Our Network