Sometimes? The lines get blurred: recent cases from Illinois, North Carolina, Arkansas & New Mexico

Newspaper reportage has led to the announcement of an Illinois state probe into possible workers’ comp fraud at the Menard Correctional Center, where nearly 400 guards and workers–including the warden–have filed claims totaling nearly $10 million in three years. As discussed in a previous post, Illinois is in the middle of a workers’ comp debate, with one side denouncing proposed losses for injured workers while the other side claims the high cost of workers’ comp premiums deters new business from locating in the state.

According to a Dec. 30 story at the Belleville News-Democrat’s Web site, the chairman of the Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission told the paper that he was “surprised that with all the different agencies that are involved, that it’s taken you guys [i.e., the newspaper] to bring this to my attention. My eyes are wide open. … It’s hard for me to imagine it’s all kosher.”

According to the article, “More than 500 claims, including a $75,678 payment to the prison’s warden in June, have been filed since Jan. 1, 2008. Approximately 290 cases are pending. More than 230 prison workers contend they were injured not because of an accident but through repetitive trauma caused over years mainly by operating manual cell locking mechanisms. Carpal tunnel syndrome can result from repetitive trauma.

“After learning the results of a News-Democrat investigation that revealed these figures, Mitch Weisz, chairman of the Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission, said Wednesday he has called for an official investigation of the Menard claims by the state’s Department of Insurance and has contacted the agency’s Director Michael McRaith.”

We’ve discussed before the degree of differences among state rules and regulations governing workers’ comp coverage, noting that in some states workers are covered while traveling to and from work although other states are more restrictive. This is but one reason to consider hiring a trained, experienced attorney for complex, adversarial injury cases.

Today we have plenty of examples that illustrate such differences.

In North Carolina, an ex-Marine who became a public school principal known for visible, anti-gang efforts was injured by a shotgun blast to the face on the way to work at Robeson County’s Fairmount Middle School. According to this Dec. 30 story, former principal James Hunt was subsequently awarded workers’ comp payments for the shooting injuries by the state Industrial Commission.

So…does the school district hold a rally to commission a statue of Hunt?

Nope.

Here’s the lede: “Robeson County Schools has appealed a state commission’s ruling that a principal who was shot last year on his way to school deserves workers’ compensation for his injuries.”

Here’s the finale: “School district lawyers maintain that taxpayers shouldn’t have to pay compensation because the shooting happened while Hunt was away from school property.”

Makes you wonder what the district will do if a coach or athlete gets hurt in an away game.

Now, in Arkansas, the state Supreme Court had to get involved in the case of a worker who got tired waiting in line with everybody else who simply wanted their paychecks. She decided to smoke outside while the line thinned out and apparently got hurt in a fall on her way back to the paycheck line.

The original workers’ comp panel ruled the injury compensable–after all, she was on break–but the medical provider appealed.

From the Dec. 13 piece at Insurance Journal: “The Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission originally found for Woods, deciding that her injury was compensable. But Jonesboro Care & Rehab Center appealed, maintaining that she was not performing employment services when she sustained the injury. Instead the Center asserted ‘that at the time of her injury, appellee was taking a personal break that did not directly or indirectly advance her employer’s interest,’ the Court explained. The appeals court sided with the Center.

“The [Supreme] Court ruled Woods was doing work at the time of her injury — by remaining on site until she could pick up her paycheck, as required by her employer. It vacated the decision of the appeals court and affirmed the ruling of the Workers’ Compensation Commission.”

Our last case of the day involves alcohol consumption, and, curiously, the ruling hinges on performance criteria rather than the rules ‘n regs of what legally constitutes “being drunk.”

Merely judging from the Dec. 29 Insurance Journal story, it seems as though the Las Cruces, NM, trash-truck worker may have been drinking either before-shift or during. At some point, in what sounds like a fairly intricate maneuver to extract “a trash bin that was stuck in the truck hopper,” Edward Villa:

. . . reached for the chain, he lost his balance, fell and seriously injured himself.

The city argued that on the day of the accident, Villa’s blood-alcohol level was 0.12, over the New Mexico legal driving limit. However, in assessing Villa’s intoxication for the purpose of recovery benefits, the workers’ compensation judge noted that although Villa was intoxicated, his co-worker and supervisor did not notice a problem with Villa’s behavior.

“[T]he fact that workers was inebriated … does not resolve the legal effect of it on his claim for benefits,” the WCJ concluded. Thus, the judge issued a 10 percent penalty for being intoxicated, and said the state had to award the remaining 90 percent of workers’ comp benefits.

Bottom line, I guess, Villa was not driving. So how or why would driving rules apply?

Then there’s the problem with co-workers’ testimony about Villa’s behavior.

From getting shot in the face, to falling off a garbage truck…strange world.

***********************************************************************************************************************
Frequently enough, a worker’s compensation case may be so complex as to demand legal representation. However, sometimes what seems like a cut-and-dried situation to an injured worker may result in a smaller award than envisioned–or even a denial. Have you, a friend or a loved one been injured on the job? Whether you’re merely seeking answers about your rights or believe a lawsuit may be necessary, be sure to seek counsel with attorneys trained and experienced in workers’ compensation. Here’s some resources:

Workers compensation basics

Injury on the job

Filing a claim



Need Help with your Workers Comp Claim?

Fill out the short form below and a local Workers Comp attorney will review your case for FREE!
Don't wait -- Get help winning your workers comp case today!




In addition to its role in the meltdown, AIG settles in multi-million workers’ comp case

Illinois has its own dispute to settle: injured workers’ rights versus costs of premiums

AIG, the giant insurer and derivatives player known most recently for its bailout excesses and subsequent sell-offs and name changes of subsidiaries, was also the subject of an earlier SEC investigation.  The consequent settlement resulted in a return of “more than $800 million in Fair Funds to harmed investors in American International Group, Inc., which settled SEC charges of financial fraud and improper financial reporting and disclosure over a four-year period,” according to this SEC press release.

Out of bounds, long ago

Now it turns out that the insurance behemoth was playing fast and loose with workers’ comp regulations long before the SEC financial investigation.

According to a Dec. 23 AP story, “American Insurance Group Inc. and its insurance affiliates have agreed to pay more than $100 million in fines and other penalties to resolve claims the insurer violated workers compensation regulations.

“New York-based AIG also agreed to pay about $46.5 million in additional taxes and assessments.”

Possible effects on current litigation

Moreover, Bloomberg says the settlement may hurt AIG in a separate, high-dollar court action, also related to workers’ comp insurance:  “American International Group Inc., the company defending itself against a $1 billion workers’ compensation lawsuit filed by rival insurers, may have handed its accusers momentum by agreeing to pay $146.5 million to settle a probe by regulators.

“ ‘That certainly can’t help their position in court,’ said Edward Priz, president of Riverside, Illinois-based commercial insurance consultant Advanced Insurance Management LLC.”

A Dec. 22 Reuters article reports that “In addition to the fines, AIG will pay $46.5 million in taxes and assessments and has agreed to a potential $150 million in extra fines if it does not follow a compliance plan.

‘More than $2 billion’ misreported

“Pennsylvania authorities said the primary violation was the misreporting of more than $2 billion in workers’ comp premiums as general or commercial auto liability premiums.

“The examination focused on actions between 1975 and 1996, the same period that was the subject of the 2006 regulatory settlement between AIG and New York state, AIG spokesman Mark Herr said in a statement.”

States must approve, in majority

And the Wall Street Journal says, “The settlement requires formal approval from a number of states, and won’t be complete until AIG resolves litigation pending in federal court in Chicago with rival insurers over similar issues, the regulators’ statement said.”

Illinois debates costs versus benefits to injured workers

In Illinois, there’s quite a dust-up in the making over workers’ comp reform.

In a Dec. 28 press release, the workers’ comp and personal injury law firm of Katz, Friedman, Eagle, Eisenstein, Johnson and Bareck take the position that proposed reforms are, simply put, awful for injured workers, in two major areas:

The Illinois legislative bodies are currently considering changing the Illinois Workers’ Compensation Act in a way which sharply reduces the rights and benefits of the injured worker. Among the changes proposed is to eliminate the injured workers’ first choice of a treating doctor. The proposed legislation will require the injured worker to initially treat with the company appointed physician. The injured worker will then have the right to choose his or her own physician, but will be limited to one choice only.

Another change proposed is to reduce the benefit payment to those workers most seriously injured: those who are unable to return to work in their usual and customary employment. These injured workers suffer permanent wage loss which is now only partially compensated, but under the proposed legislation will be further limited.

Looking closely at costs

Although laudable for its concern about injured workers, the law firm PR does not mention cost of workers’ comp premiums, which we discussed in an Oct. 24 post, based mostly on this report from Oregon, which shows Illinois has the third highest rates in the nation.

And that’s where the insurance industry and Illinois employers are hanging their hats, as evidenced by a Dec. 17 post at Insurance Journal:

Independent insurance agents in Illinois are urging state lawmakers to pass workers’ compensation reforms in early January, before a new General Assembly will be sworn in.

“The facts are alarming,” stated Todd Henricks, president of the Independent Insurance Agents of Illinois (IIAI), in a message to the General Assembly urging lawmakers to take steps to lower the cost of the coverage and improve the state’s business climate.

Henricks said workers compensation costs in Illinois were at one time about average in comparison to the 50 states [but have since risen to third highest, as noted].

A barrier for incoming business?

A longish story at an Illinois regional news site tells the tale from the perspective of employers, including city government, who contend that the state’s workers’ comp rates not only throttle down business–and hiring–but also act as a roadblock to luring new business to the state. The story also contains several anecdotal examples of employees who abuse the workers’ comp system, perhaps with the aid of unethical medical providers.

According to The Daily Republican, Teresa Katubig, “president and CEO of Extra Help Employment and Payroll Services, which provides employees for large employers and other business owners were quick to point out that 85-90 percent of their employees do not file frivolous claims, but it’s the ones who do which drive up costs.

“ ‘Workers’ compensation can’t be an insurance program for employees who don’t have insurance,’ Katubig said. ‘I’ve heard employees tell their friends that, “It doesn’t matter, insurance is paying for it.” It does matter, because the businesses are the ones footing the bill.” ‘ ”

***********************************************************************************************************************
Frequently enough, a worker’s compensation case may be so complex as to demand legal representation. However, sometimes what seems like a cut-and-dried situation to an injured worker may result in a smaller award than envisioned–or even a denial. Have you, a friend or a loved one been injured on the job? Whether you’re merely seeking answers about your rights or believe a lawsuit may be necessary, be sure to seek counsel with attorneys trained and experienced in workers’ compensation. Here’s some resources:

Workers compensation basics

Injury on the job

Filing a claim



Need Help with your Workers Comp Claim?

Fill out the short form below and a local Workers Comp attorney will review your case for FREE!
Don't wait -- Get help winning your workers comp case today!




Personnel shift at big California fund leads to ‘dumb workforce’ comment; appeals court OKs laying off three Missouri workers’ comp judges

Boy, howdy, seems like “accuracy” is all a matter of perspective–even in the field of workers’ comp.

In a recent press release, we see “State Fund, California’s largest provider of workers’ compensation insurance for nearly 100 years, announced today a geographic strategy that will position the company even more strongly for the future.

State Fund press release

“State Fund will reduce its real estate footprint over the next three years and consolidate operations into areas of the state where it is more economical to do business. State Fund expects to save nearly $200 million in operating costs, delivering a more efficient and agile insurer, better prepared to effectively manage the cost of workers’ compensation for all Californians.”

‘Workforce too dumb’: SF Chronicle

But check out the lede from a Dec. 13 post at the San Francisco Chronicle’s site: “After almost 100 years, the State Compensation Insurance Fund is pulling 755 of its 830 jobs out of town, having determined that San Francisco is just too expensive–and its workforce too dumb–for the agency to continue doing most of its business here.

“Workers called to a recent meeting at the Herbst Theatre were told that 293 jobs will move to Pleasanton, 422 to Vacaville and 40 to Sacramento, with 75 employees remaining in the city.”
To support the “dumb workforce” remark, the piece attributes agency spokesperson Jennifer Vargen and cites test data:

But the high cost of Bay Area living is only part of the problem, Vargen said. The agency also seems to have trouble attracting qualified workers here.

“We have to do a lot more testing to get qualified candidates,” Vargen said.

For example, only half of the San Francisco applicants passed the most recent test to become workers’ compensation claim adjusters–compared with the 90 percent pass rate in Eureka.

Alt paper has another take

Alas, the SF Weekly offers a third choice, neither as rah-rah boosterist as the agency’s PR, nor as harshly blunt as the Chronicle piece: “No, San Franciscans are not “dumber” than workers in the hinterlands. It’s just that you’re going to have to spend a lot more to find a lot less when it comes to college grads able and willing to work for $3,100 a month here.

“That, by the way, is what the starting pay is for a State Fund claims adjuster. So, when agency spokeswoman Jennifer Vargen states that vast amounts more outreach was required in San Francisco than elsewhere to attract college-educated workers for a job that tops out at $50,000 — it’s not necessarily due to a collective layer of stupidity hanging over the city like fog.

“Claims adjusters in the State Fund’s Vacaville office — where 422 city workers are headed — earn the same pay. That kind of money goes a lot further in Vacaville than it does here. You get more applicants, and more qualified applicants, with less in the way of outreach.”

Brass won’t move

Regardless, besides San Francisco, the cities of Santa Rosa, San Jose, San Diego, and Oxnard will be losing fund workers, and offices will be closed in Glendale, Burbank, City of Commerce, and San Bernadino.

Wanna take a guess at who doesn’t have to move? That’s right–the top execs, including attorneys who have to make frequent court appearances in San Fran… State charter says the HQ must be in SF.

Three workers’ comp judges laid off in Missouri

A Missouri appellate court has ruled that three administrative law judges who rule on workers’ comp cases can be laid off by the state as it continues budget cuts, according to a Dec. 13 brief at Courthouse News Service: “Overturning a lower court’s November ruling, a three-member panel found that lawmaker’s budget-cutting decisions were reason enough to reduce the number of judges.”

The state had sought to reduce five judges’ positions, following budget cuts approved by the legislature in June 2009.

According to a Dec. 9 piece at InsuranceJournal.com, “Three of the judges — Henry Herschel, Matthew Murphy and John Tackes — sued to keep their jobs, arguing that administrative law judges can only be removed after their terms expire or only upon the recommendation of an evaluation committee.

“A lower court agreed with the judges and blocked the state from dismissing them.”

However, the three-member panel of appellate court overruled the lower court, finding that “lawmakers’ budget-cutting decisions were enough reason to authorize state labor officials to shrink the number of administrative law judges.”

Calls to the judges’ attorney and to the labor department were not returned by deadline time, according to IJ.com, so it wasn’t clear whether the judges had actually been dismissed.

***********************************************************************************************************************
Frequently enough, a worker’s compensation case may be so complex as to demand legal representation. However, sometimes what seems like a cut-and-dried situation to an injured worker may result in a smaller award than envisioned–or even a denial. Have you, a friend or a loved one been injured on the job? Whether you’re merely seeking answers about your rights or believe a lawsuit may be necessary, be sure to seek counsel with attorneys trained and experienced in workers’ compensation. Here’s some resources:

Workers compensation basics

Injury on the job

Filing a claim



Need Help with your Workers Comp Claim?

Fill out the short form below and a local Workers Comp attorney will review your case for FREE!
Don't wait -- Get help winning your workers comp case today!




What Is Workers’ Compensation In Oklahoma

Oklahoma workers compensation can provide employees who suffer an injury at work with fixed monetary benefits and medical care without having to file a personal injury claim against their employer. Employers provide benefits without the employee proving the employer’s negligence contributed to the work injury, and employees accept less than they may have won with a personal injury claim.

Workers comp insurance does not pay for work injuries which are the result of intoxication, reckless actions or intentional actions which are meant to injure themselves or other employees. Most Oklahoma employers are required to pay for all other work injuries or occupational illnesses which occur while an employee is engaged in their normal job duties. Common injuries which may be covered include:

  • Back and neck injuries
  • Abrasions and burns
  • Amputations of arms or legs
  • Concussions
  • Heart attack or strokes on the job
  • Carpel Tunnel
  • Diseases caused by inhalation of chemicals or other toxins

Oklahoma Workers Compensation Benefits

Work comp insurance was created to help the employee have easy access to medical benefits, temporary disability benefits, permanent disability benefits, vocational rehabilitation and death benefits. The following benefits are described below:

  • Medical Benefits – Work comp insurance provides necessary and reasonable medical care for Oklahoma workers who are injured on the job. All medical costs are paid including: laboratory services, surgery, medications, hospital visits and physical therapy.  There is no cost or time limits for medical care.
  • Temporary Total Disability – Oklahoma workers who are temporarily totally disabled and are unable to work, but will at some point return to work at full capacity, are eligible to receive 70% of their weekly wage (with a limit of $473 per week) for a maximum of 156 weeks. Benefits may be extended for additional weeks with authorization from the Oklahoma’s Workers’ Compensation Court. The first three days of incapacity are not paid.
  • Permanent Partial Disability – Oklahoma workers who suffer a permanent partial injury must be evaluated to determine the extent of the injury and the amount of compensation they can receive. Work injury compensation is 70% of the employee’s average weekly wage, but the duration of the payment is determined by a set schedule. For example: A loss of a thumb entitles a worker to 66 weeks of disability payments.
  • Permanent Total Disability – Oklahoma workers who suffer an injury at work and are unable to return to any type of employment may qualify for permanent total disability payments. Work injury compensation for a total disability is 70% of the AWW for the duration of the disability.
  • Vocational Rehabilitation – Oklahoma employees who sustain an injury at work and need help to return to their job or to find new employment may be eligible for vocational rehabilitation.
  • Death Benefits – Oklahoma spouses of a deceased worker may be eligible for lost wage compensation of 70% of the deceased worker’s average weekly wage and an additional 15% for each child up to 30% which is the maximum established by workers compensation law. Benefits may change if the spouse remarries. Funeral expenses are paid up to $10,000. Variations and requirements for death benefits can be complicated and should be evaluated by a work injury lawyer.

Do I Need an Oklahoma Worker’s Compensation Attorney?

Thousands of Oklahoma workers file workers compensation claims each year and depending on the work injury, the statutes and laws can be complicated. Work injury lawyers may be a good resource to help the employee file their work compensation claim and get the benefits they deserve. Oklahoma worker’s compensation lawyers can also help the injured worker if they have become the victim of workplace discrimination or harassment.



Need Help with your Workers Comp Claim?

Fill out the short form below and a local Workers Comp attorney will review your case for FREE!
Don't wait -- Get help winning your workers comp case today!




Workers’ Comp versus Personal Injury claims: How to proceed?

A Dec. 13 post at the Injury Board Blog Network by personal injury lawyer Alison De Villiers posits the question of whether an injured worker covered by workers’ comp can also qualify for a personal injury claim. For example, we’ve all heard of people who get injured in an auto wreck, a grocery store, or say, by hot coffee, and then their personal injury attorney helps them get some fabulous settlement.

Well, the short answer for on-the-job injuries is, no: if your employer carries workers’ compensation insurance, you are entitled to medical treatment and perhaps certain, specified disability benefits, if warranted.

But, in general, you can’t sue–unless you are denied proper treatment.

Basically, this is why employers take out workers’ comp insurance. In return for the overhead of the premiums, injured workers get treated and employers can’t be sued. It’s also why most states require most employers to carry workers’ comp policies.

However as De Villiers, a Cincinnati-based attorney, points out, it is possible at least in some states for an injured worker to receive workers’ comp benefits and to also have a case for personal injury–as long as the entity at fault is not the injured party’s employer. As De Villiers explains:

So how can an injured worker bring a personal injury claim? Although injured workers receiving worker’s compensation benefits cannot sue their employers, they can bring personal injury claims against a co-worker or other person/company, such as another company working on a jobsite. The injured worker must prove that the other party was negligent and the defendant is then entitled to present defenses. In a personal injury claim, the injured worker is entitled to more benefits than in worker’s compensation, such as pain, suffering, loss of earning capacity, loss of enjoyment of life, scarring and disfigurement, and loss of consortium.

In other words, let’s imagine an electrician at work on a construction site. The job is proceeding normally, that is, on time and within budget, so the electricians are the only tradesmen on the jobsite. Let’s say the electrician is working with heavy cable, and cuts one hand badly while attempting to strip insulation from a cable end. The injured electrician reports the injury, goes to the proper care facility and gets stitches and any other necessary treatment and follow-up. Neither the carrier nor the care provider (hospital, clinic, etc.) worries about “whose fault it was.” The employer has fulfilled its duty, and there’s no cause for further legal action.

Now, let’s imagine a different scenario. A small commercial job has gotten badly behind schedule, and the retail business is in danger of missing its opening. As a result, the client (the retail business) is exerting tremendous pressure on the general contractor, who in turn leans on the job superintendent. The super may go by several titles, according to region, industry, sector, and so forth.

Regardless, there’s always someone who’s “in charge” of the daily operations of the jobsite and all the trades. In a situation as described–and I’ve seen it happen–the “super” will convene a meeting that includes, or otherwise communicates to, all the subcontractors.

What happens next is all the trades show up, and suddenly you’ve got framers, drywallers, painters, plumbers, electricians, HVAC, pipefitters, and telephone/cable guys, and God knows who else (“I’m here to pick the fabric”) all on the same jobsite, everyone busting hump to beat the deadline.

Now, let’s suppose our good, honest electrician is working atop a 28-foot ladder, when suddenly someone knocks the ladder out from under our earnest electrician…such that the electrician bounces off structural elements in the building, then slams to the floor–a hard, concrete slab.

Maybe our electrician recovers fully. Or, the brain damage is bad enough that further work is impossible…

In a case such as this, the injured worker is obviously still due any workers’ comp benefits as apply. However, now a third party might be liable, apart from the direct employer.

These decisions and distinctions can be confusing.

That’s why De Villiers posts this: “It is important that you speak to an attorney to determine whether you are limited to the benefits available in a worker’s compensation claim, or whether you may be entitled to be ‘made whole’ with a personal injury claim.”

I agree–it shouldn’t be…but it is, most definitely, tricky stuff.

***********************************************************************************************************************
Frequently enough, a worker’s compensation case may be so complex as to demand legal representation. However, sometimes what seems like a cut-and-dried situation to an injured worker may result in a smaller award than envisioned–or even a denial. Have you, a friend or a loved one been injured on the job? Whether you’re merely seeking answers about your rights or believe a lawsuit may be necessary, be sure to seek counsel with attorneys trained and experienced in workers’ compensation. Here’s some resources:

Workers compensation basics

Injury on the job

Filing a claim



Need Help with your Workers Comp Claim?

Fill out the short form below and a local Workers Comp attorney will review your case for FREE!
Don't wait -- Get help winning your workers comp case today!




‘Company Nurse,’ ‘Pay As You Go’ programs promise innovation

We’ve covered changes effected and proposed in workers’ compensation systems in various states, including proposals not only from legislative, judicial and executive branches of state governments but also from electoral propositions.

However, private industry also comes up with new wrinkles, new products and programs that promise improvements in efficiency or costs.

Company Nurse Injury Hotline

One such is described in a recent press release from a 13-year-old company based in Scottsdale, AZ, announcing services available from its Company Nurse Injury Hotline.

According to the PR:

When a workplace injury occurs, client employees and supervisors call Company Nurse to report injuries and to speak with a triage nurse. Unlike nurse case managers, triage nurses get involved at the front end of the claims process, essentially on the day of injury — which is the earliest, most critical point at which to influence medical care, claims costs, return-to-work (RTW) outcomes, and employee satisfaction. Many organizations view nurse injury triage as a vital part of their corporate wellness, employee wellness, and employee health programs.

“Our nurses assess injuries over the phone and refer employees to the most appropriate level of care — whether it’s an urgent care facility, occupational clinic, or simple first aid,” said Paul Binsfeld, CEO of Company Nurse. “As a result, our Injury Hotline facilitates immediate, critical medical decisions that positively impact an employee’s medical care, as well as overall claims’ costs and outcomes.”

Decreases reported in costs, litigation

According to a November post at Risk & Insurance.com, “Since developing the company, [founder Paul Binsfeld] says employers have seen remarkable savings of 15 to 20 percent and up to 40 percent. The City of Little Rock, Ark., saw a 39 percent decrease in workers’ comp claims costs. And a hospice company with a mobile, in-the-field workforce and a decentralized injury reporting process reduced its lag time from an average of 17 days to two days, and litigation drop by nearly 40 percent. Most other organizations, he said, achieve virtually 100 percent same-day reporting.”

Improved referrals reported

Another satisfied customer, according to the company is the Boys and Girls Clubs of Metropolitan Phoenix, where Carol S. Sterling is the Human Resources Manager. “As an early adopter of the Company Nurse program, her organization experienced several key benefits. ‘First, we receive instant notification of injuries, so we can immediately file our first report of injury forms,’ said Sterling. ‘Second, Company Nurse is extremely flexible. We were able to include our local network of preferred providers in their referral process. Third, Company Nurse helps to control medical expenses, as triage nurses often refer injured workers to urgent care clinics, rather than the ER, which saves costs and still ensures quality care. Fourth, supervisors experience “peace of mind” in knowing injured employees are immediately assessed and referred for appropriate treatment, and we also experience smooth processing of claims and medical bills among the provider, insurance company, and employer.’ ”

Here’s a link to a brief .pdf file of a report by the company.

‘Pay As You Go’ program announced

Another company claiming to offer innovative services in various human resource areas, including workers’ compensation, is Unicorn HRO, a New Jersey-based company founded in 1982, with offices in four states.  Unicorn says it has more than 900 U.S. and international clients, with more than one million employees.

In a Dec. 12 press release, the company “announced today that it will begin offering ‘Pay As You Go’ Workers’ Compensation insurance as part of its suite of services. The . . . system for managing workers’ compensation insurance offers employers the compelling advantage of being able to manage workers’ compensation insurance payments in real time, thus allowing for simple, accurate and fiscally responsible cash flow management. The  . . . offering will eliminate the need for large installment payments and costly annual end of year workers’ compensation insurance reconciliation audits. The insurance premium calculations are automatically processed through Unicorn HRO®’s payroll solutions system.”

Highlights listed

On one of its Web pages, the company says the highlights of the system include the ability to:

  • Maximize cash flow by eliminating large upfront installment payments
  • Pay workers’ compensation premiums based on actual payrolls rather than estimates
  • Obtain real-time evaluation of premium payment history and calculation
  • Eliminate the need for costly year-end insurance reconciliation audits

The company also emphasizes that  the “offering of the ‘Pay As You Go’ . . .  payroll services is not the offer or sale of any insurance product.”

***********************************************************************************************************************
Frequently enough, a worker’s compensation case may be so complex as to demand legal representation. However, sometimes what seems like a cut-and-dried situation to an injured worker may result in a smaller award than envisioned–or even a denial. Have you, a friend or a loved one been injured on the job? Whether you’re merely seeking answers about your rights or believe a lawsuit may be necessary, be sure to seek counsel with attorneys trained and experienced in workers’ compensation. Here’s some resources:

Workers compensation basics

Injury on the job

Filing a claim



Need Help with your Workers Comp Claim?

Fill out the short form below and a local Workers Comp attorney will review your case for FREE!
Don't wait -- Get help winning your workers comp case today!




Workers’ comp fraud carries risk of stiff fines, long jail sentences

As regular readers know, we’ve covered many cases demonstrating that it’s just not worth it to try to game the system, regardless of whether the schemer is a provider, carrier, employer or employee.

Today’s cases involve two companies, which naturally tend to involve larger sums, and two employees, whose backgrounds suggest they should know better.

Fifteen felony counts

On the West Coast, the owners of Granite Bay, California-based T.B. Concrete Company, Inc. have “been charged with 15 felony counts of payroll tax evasion and workers’ compensation insurance fraud,” according to a Nov. 30 account in this local news outfit.

According to the Central Valley Business Times, “The owners of a Placer County concrete company have been charged by the state with submitting false payroll reports and misrepresenting the status of employees as independent contractors. The company is accused of owing the state $230,000 in back taxes.

” ‘This company cheated the state out of hundreds of thousands of dollars in taxes and workers’ compensation premiums by submitting phony data and disguising wages as payments to independent contractors,’ says Attorney General Edmund Brown Jr.”

Another Nov. 30 account in the Sacramento Business Journal says, “Thomas Bernhardt, the founder and chief executive, and his wife Rachel Bernhardt, the company’s office manager, are scheduled to be arraigned today in Placer County Superior Court on 15 felony counts of payroll tax evasion and workers’ compensation insurance fraud. Both are free on bail. It was unclear whether the pair had retained counsel.”

Four counts of workers’ comp fraud

In Tennessee, “A Memphis business owner has been busted for Worker’s Compensation Fraud,” according to a local Fox affiliate, reporting on yet another case under-reporting employees.

“Richard Nobles, also known as Mike Nobles, the owner of several subcontract labor companies, was indicted on four counts of workers’ compensation fraud.
“According to the indictment Nobles underreported the number of workers on his payroll with intent to defraud four separate insurance companies of workers’ compensation premiums due to them.”

The story says that Nobles, who owns several subcontract labor companies, is alleged to have underpaid premiums of more than a million dollars.

Indirectly quoted in the Fox affiliate’s story, District Attorney Bill Gibbons said Nobles was difficult to track down and when taken into custody on Nov. 10, he was picked up with “packed bags.”

Facing 12 years on each count

However, according to a Nov. 13 piece in The Memphis Commercial Appeal, “His attorney, Jeffrey Jones, said his client has cooperated with investigators and that he was not trying to flee.

” ‘He understands he is facing serious charges, but flight from prosecution was never a consideration,’ Jones said.

” ‘The state executed a search warrant on his business in June and informed him that he was under suspicion. If he had wanted to flee, he would have done so months ago.’ ”

Nobles, 58, faces up to 12 years on each of the four counts of workers’ comp fraud over $60,000.

Former DOT worker in Connecticut

A Nov. 24 account from a Connecticut news site says, “Former state Department of Transportation employee Clint J. Verdone, 33, of Hebron, was charged with fraudulent claim or receipt of benefits Tuesday, according to a press release issued by the Connecticut Division of Criminal Justice [CDCJ].”

In that press release, CCCJ said:

Clint J. Verdone, age 33, of Hebron, was charged with Fraudulent Claim or Receipt of Benefits, a felony punishable by up to 20 years in prison.

According to the arrest warrant affidavit, Mr. Verdone collected more than $12,000 in disability benefits as a result of a work-related injury he supposedly suffered on September 22, 2009, while employed by the DOT.

The warrant alleges that during the time he was receiving benefits Mr. Verdone failed to disclose his work capacity and the income he earned while working at his business, Diamond Landscaping.

He was released on a written promise to appear in Rockville Superior Court, G.A. No. 19 on December 3, 2010.

Ex-corrections officer gets mix of jail, probation, fine

Apparently facing the least amount of jail time in any of these cases is a man who already pleaded guilty, a former “Attica Correctional Facility officer formerly from Batavia [who] was sentenced to four months in jail and five years of probation Monday in Genesee County Court” in New York, according to a Nov. 15 story in this local new site.

James S. Gibbs, who completed two months’ sentence, will serve two more before being released to probation and has had his share of other problems, according toa Batavia news site: “In May, Gibbs admitted to charges of grand larceny and attempted workers compensation fraud. He also agreed to more than $40,000 in restitution, with $20,000 payable before his sentencing.

“Since then he’s allegedly violated the terms of his presentencing release by getting arrested in Monroe County on a possession of a controlled substance charge, and he’s been through a divorce in which the couple lost their home.”

However, his attorney seems to have been successful in arranging more lenient payback terms. Of a $20,000 scheduled payment, Gibbs has paid about $3,000.

“Over the five years of his probation, his attorney Thomas Burns noted, paying back nearly $38,000 would work out to more than $600 per month, which Burns said seemed like a steep amount to expect Gibbs to pay back (among other expenses, Gibbs must pay child support). He asked for payments of $175 per month.”

The district attorney agreed that the payback term for such an amount in five years would be difficult and Judge Robert C. Noonan set payments at $200 per month, setting a review of restitution for summer 2011.

***********************************************************************************************************************
Frequently enough, a worker’s compensation case may be so complex as to demand legal representation. However, sometimes what seems like a cut-and-dried situation to an injured worker may result in a smaller award than envisioned–or even a denial. Have you, a friend or a loved one been injured on the job? Whether you’re merely seeking answers about your rights or believe a lawsuit may be necessary, be sure to seek counsel with attorneys trained and experienced in workers’ compensation. Here’s some resources:

Workers compensation basics

Injury on the job

Filing a claim



Need Help with your Workers Comp Claim?

Fill out the short form below and a local Workers Comp attorney will review your case for FREE!
Don't wait -- Get help winning your workers comp case today!